Features
Each of these is sold as a separate service elsewhere. Here they run on the same two things — the contract and the operational record — so a shift between them costs nothing but the re-reading of the same paper.
Every supplier line tested against the contracted rate for that carrier, station and service date, and against the operational record.
Climb and speed profiles, tankering decisions against station price differentials, and density-corrected uplift checking.
What you are contracted to pay, against what the market pays at that station — before it compounds into an audit finding.
EU ETS, UK ETS and CORSIA liability reconstructed from actual uplift and route data rather than accepted as invoiced.
The audit needs the invoice, the contract and the operational record. The first two arrive as documents, so a number can be produced before anyone signs an integration agreement.
A finding is delivered with the line, the amount billed, the amount properly due and the basis of the difference. What cannot be evidenced is not claimed.
The fee attaches to verified recoveries only. A finding the supplier rejects is not a recovery, and is not charged for.
The output is built to be accepted
The deliverable of an engagement is not a dashboard or a findings deck. It is a claim pack addressed to the supplier: the line, the contract it breaches, the operational record that proves it, and the amount due back. A number the client believes in but the supplier can wave away has no value; a number the supplier credits does.